Nearest 360 · 21 mi
Satellite · Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics
Open the nearest 360° capture
Nearest capture 21 mi from this spot
Journal entry · May 11, 1805
Clark: May 11, 1805
William Clark · Missouri River Breaks area
The place today: Missouri River Breaks area
May the 11th Satturday 1805. Wind hard fore part of last night the latter
part verry Cold a white frost this morning, the river riseing a little and
verry Crooked the high land is rugged and approaches nearer than below,
the hills and bluff exhibit more mineral quats & Salts than below, the
gullies in maney places are white, and their bottoms one, two & 3
Inches deep of this mineral, no appearance of either burnt pumice Stone or
Coal, the Countrey hilley on both Sides of a rich black earth, which
disolves This kind of Countrey Continues of the Same quallity for maney
miles on either Side, we observed Some hills which appeared to be
timbered, I walked to this timber and found it to pitch pine & Dwarf
Cedar, we observe in every derection Buffalow, Elk, Antelopes & Mule
deer inumerable and So jintle that we Could approach near them with great
ease, I killed 2 Mule Deer for the benifit of their Skins for the party,
and about the place I expected the party would get to Camp I killed 2 fat
Bulls for theire use, in my absence they had killed a fine fat Yellow bear
below which detained them and they did not reach the place I expected, but
had Camped on the Lard. Side about 2 miles below on my return to the party
I killed a fat Beaver the wind blew verry hard from the S. W. all the
after part of this day which retarded our progress verry much. river rose
2 In
Entities mentioned in this entry
Auto-extracted from the entry text. Hover any entity for context.
The NPS atlas for this night
right shore, 13 mi SW Fort Peck, MT
NPS campsite reconstruction (Bergantino)
About 18.5 miles of travel mapped this day (NPS’s reconstruction of the course)
Source: National Park Service, Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail Park Atlas.
Help improve this record
See something that needs correcting, or know a source we are missing? The archive gets better through its readers.