Cross-narrator analysis · July 22, 1805

Onion Island and the Shoshone Homeland: Three Views of a Hopeful Day

3 primary source entries

The entries of July 22, 1805, written as the Corps of Discovery moved up the Missouri above the Great Falls, capture a turning point in the expedition’s western progress. Sacagawea’s recognition of the surrounding country signaled that the Three Forks—and the Shoshone people whose horses the captains needed—lay close at hand. Yet the three journal-keepers present that day, Meriwether Lewis, William Clark, and Patrick Gass, render the moment in registers so different that they almost describe three separate days.

A Botanist, a Surveyor, a Soldier

Lewis’s entry is by far the longest and most varied, moving fluidly between cartography, botany, and incident. Frustrated that the river was “divided into such a number of channels by both large and small Island that I found it impossible to lay it down correctly following one channel only in a canoe,” he walked the shore taking courses and sketching the braided channels onto his chart. On one island he found wild onions in extraordinary abundance:

I met with great quantities of a smal onion about the size of a musquit ball and some even larger; they were white crisp and well flavored I geathered about half a bushel of them before the canoes arrived.

Lewis judged the plant “valuable” because it “produces a large quantity to the squar foot and bears with ease the rigor of this climate,” and christened the place Onion Island. Gass, traveling with the canoe party, registers the same encounter much more tersely: “Here we got a quantity of wild onions.” Where Lewis weighs the plant’s agricultural promise and gathers seed, Gass notes only the foraging fact. Clark, separated from both men with an advance party and laid up by injury, does not mention onions at all.

The contrast extends to the day’s other notable incidents. Lewis describes shooting an otter that sank in eight feet of clear water and diving to retrieve it; he records placing his thermometer in shade and dispatching Sergeant Ordway back to recover it after he forgot it on the bank, noting the mercury at 80°—”the warmest day except one which we have experienced this summer.” None of these details appear in Gass or Clark. Gass, by contrast, is the only narrator on this date to mention seeing “several banks of snow on a mountain west of us”—a detail that escapes Lewis’s botanical attention entirely.

Sacagawea’s Recognition

The most consequential moment of the day is reported by both Lewis and Gass, but with revealing differences. Gass writes plainly: “At breakfast our squaw informed us she had been at this place before when small.” Lewis dramatizes the same intelligence and explains its significance to the mission:

The Indian woman recognizes the country and assures us that this is the river on which her relations live, and that the three forks are at no great distance. this peice of information has cheered the sperits of the party who now begin to console themselves with the anticipation of shortly seeing the head of the missouri yet unknown to the civilized world.

Gass records the fact; Lewis records the morale. The sergeant’s spare prose preserves Sacagawea’s biographical claim—she had been here “when small”—while the captain absorbs that claim into the larger imperial narrative of reaching a head of the Missouri “yet unknown to the civilized world.” Clark, absent from this breakfast, writes nothing of the recognition, but his decision that day to push ahead overland with Drouillard, the Field brothers, Frazer, and Charbonneau “in pursute of the Snake Indians on tomorrow” is itself a direct consequence of the news.

The Body in the Margins

Clark’s journal stands apart in subject matter as well as tone. Where Lewis narrates the river and Gass summarizes the march, Clark turns inward toward physical suffering:

I opened the bruses & blisters of my feet which caused them to be painfull dispatched all the men to hunt in the bottom for Deer, deturmined my Self to lay by & nurs my feet. haveing nothing to eat but venison and Currents, I find my Self much weaker than when I left the Canoes and more inclined to rest & repose to day.

This bodily candor is characteristic of Clark’s entries during the overland reconnaissance and finds no echo in Lewis’s account, which mentions Clark’s party only obliquely through Gass’s report of their reunion. Gass, who served as a noncommissioned officer with the canoe party, supplies the meeting Lewis omits: Clark’s men “told us they had seen the same smoke, which we had discovered a few days ago, and found it had been made by the natives, who they supposed had seen some of us, and had fled, taking us for enemies.” This Indigenous flight—a warning sign that the Shoshone were avoiding contact—appears nowhere in Lewis’s entry for the day, and only glancingly in Clark’s.

Read together, the three journals demonstrate how thoroughly the expedition’s record depends on which narrator was where. Lewis gives the named landscape and the scientific specimen; Clark gives the body and the strategic decision; Gass, the workmanlike sergeant, often supplies the connective tissue—the snowbanks, the smoke, the encounter—that the captains’ more thematically organized entries leave out.

AI-Assisted Drafted with AI assistance from primary-source journal entries cited above. Reviewed and approved by [editor].

Our Partners