Nearest 360 · 7.5 mi
Satellite · Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics
Open the nearest 360° capture
Nearest capture 7.5 mi from this spot
Journal entry · September 11, 1805
Clark: September 11, 1805
William Clark · Travelers' Rest near present-day Lolo, MT
That night's camp, per the NPS campsite reconstruction (Bergantino): north side of Lolo Creek, 7½ mi west of Lolo, MT
September 11th Wednesday 1805 A fair morning wind from the N W we Set out
at 3 oClock and proceeded on up the Travelers rest Creek, accompanied by
the flat head or Tushapaws Indians about 7 miles below this Creek a large
fork comes in from the right and heads up against the waters of the
Missouri below the Three forks, this river has extensive Vallies of open
leavel land, “and passes in its Whole Course thro a Valie” they call it
our Guide tels us a fine large roade passes up this river to the MissouriThe
loss of 2 of our horses detained us util. 3 oClock. P.M. our Flathead
Indian being restless thought proper to leave us and proceed on alone,
Sent out the hunters to hunt in advance as usial. (we have Selected 4 of
the best hunters to go in advance to hunt for the party. This arrangement
has been made long sinc) we Proceeded on up the Creek on the right Side
thro a narrow valie and good road for 7 miles and Encamped at Some old
Indian Lodges, nothing killed this evening hills on the right high &
ruged, the mountains on the left high & Covered with Snow. The day
Verry worm
Entities mentioned in this entry
Auto-extracted from the entry text. Hover any entity for context.
The NPS atlas for this night
north side of Lolo Creek, 7½ mi west of Lolo, MT
NPS campsite reconstruction (Bergantino)
From the NPS Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail Park Atlas, mirrored here on September 21, 2026. This copy is not authoritative; NPS remains the system of record. About the mirror
Terrain360 · the place today
Travelers' Rest near present-day Lolo, MT in 360°
10 frames across 0.3 mi of the route around this location
Analyses
Artwork
Help improve this record
See something that needs correcting, or know a source we are missing? The archive gets better through its readers.